With current events as they are we would have been forgiven for cancelling this months meet up.

However it still went ahead. Although our hosts were not exactly rushed off their feet and feeling the impact of said events.

Our little get together was in fact for us rather well intended with seven brave souls turning up.

Jonathan, Nathan, Gavin and I decide to dabble in the stock market while waiting for others to turn up, by playing Oink Games Startups.

Startups has been sitting in my collection for nearly a couple of years now. I bought it at UKGE 2018 if my failing memory recalls correctly. It’s been one I’ve been meaning to play during that time. Often making it into the game bag for a session but never selected. Always the bridesmaid never the bride. Until last night.

Earlier in the day I had attempted to read the rule sheet that’s included in the box. However I found the print too small for my aging eyes. So I turned to the saviour of many the Internet and Google. Which took me to the official Oink Games website and their official how to play video.

The video I thought was rather well produced. Explained the game well. And somehow puzzling lasted just short of twelve minutes. I say puzzling because the rules are not that complicated.

Startups became the second Oink game I’ve played (I have two more in the collection to get to the table).

At it’s heart Startups is a set collection and majority control game.

Each player starts with a starting hand of three cards, and ten coins (worth one point). On a players turn they either draw a card from the deck and putting a coin on each of the cards in the market. Or take a card from the market. The player then has to either place a card in front of them as part of their portfolio or put one in the market.

If a player after playing a card in front of them becomes the player with the majority of that card type they get a matching anti-monopoly token. This token stops the player from taking any cards in the market that match with it. However it also means when taking a card from the deck that the player doesn’t have to put a coin on any cards that match it either.

There is a nice bluffing element to the game with the three cards that a player has in their hand. This is hidden information and the cards count towards final totals at the end of the game. Add in the fact that five cards are removed from the deck at the start of the game. You have this unknown element of not truly knowing how many of each card type there truly is out there on the table, and if you have a majority or not.

With the anti-monopoly tokens and the market place you have a nice tactical bit going on. Knowing that certain cards can’t be taken by certain players. There is a skill of staying on the right side of staying level with whoever has the token so they keep it, and allowing yourself free range of the market place.

I won. However the scores were surprisingly close. This is a nice little filler game. I’ll definitely try and get this back to the table.

By the time we had finished playing Startups, except for one player who messaged saying they would be late, everyone had turned up.

So unsure how long we would have to wait for the final player to arrive, we played New York Slice.

This game has been on my wish list for a while. Luckily Jonathan picked up a second hand copy recently. I’d say he pipped me to it. But in reality my economic circumstances would have hindered my chances of getting it. So I was pretty happy that Jonathan got it.

The packaging (a pizza box!) fits the theme perfectly.

This is a I split you choose game, with a majority control mechanic. A simple game that works so. The splitting of the pizza is such a tough decision to make. Being the splitter you will get the last piece. So it’s trying to split the pizza so that you have something left you can use.

It’s a nice game. I knew I’d like it because I enjoyed playing Piece ‘o Cake that this is a remake of with a pizza theme.

With everyone present we split into two groups.

The group I was in we played a four player game of Spirits of the Forest. My previous play of this was as a two player game with Jonathan. As a two player game it worked really well. But wow it was fun as four players two.

I think next time this hits the table I’ll add in one or two of the mini expansions that came with it.

Our groups final game of the evening was Azul. I still really enjoy this game. I still warn new players I will end the game as quick as possible. It’d be unfair if I didn’t. The two follow up games in the series haven’t tempted me. I don’t get Azul to the table often enough as it is. Maybe if I didn’t have Azul then choosing one of the other two might be an option.

As I write this post it’s hit me that all four of these games are pretty quick to teach. Five minutes at most I’d guess. Games that are easy to pick up, but hide a some hard decision making. Not that difficult to give analysis paralysis or put new players off. But enough to keep more experienced gamers interested.

As usual this was another great evening of gaming and great hosts.

Games Played: Startups, New York Slice, Spirits of the Forest, Azul

I originally hadn’t planned to attend this months meet up. Currently being economically challenged meant the resources weren’t available. Jonathan was tied up with a work commitment. So it had looked like there wouldn’t be a meet up organised this month.

Luckily Nathan took up the mantle of running and hosting this months meet up. Which I appreciated a lot.

Yesterday morning it looked like only Nathan and Gavin would be attending. So I took Nathan up on his very kind and generous offer to spot me a beverage.

I don’t find it easy accepting help, let alone letting people in close enough to know it may be needed. So when I had thanked Nathan last week for organising the meet up, and letting him know why I wasn’t doing it (something that I usually do) he kindly made the drink offer. But that was a big thing for me to have admitted the true reason and not use Nan or Mums health as an excuse. I thought Nathan deserved the truth. It hasn’t been easy writing this part of the post I’ve said more about me personally than I normally like to.

We started our evening of gaming off with a couple of games of Doodle Patchwork.

This roll and write version of Patchwork is light, quick, and surprisingly enjoyable.

Don’t get me wrong I enjoy the roll and write genre. There are three or four in my collection. But this is different. It’s more spacial than logic. You are fitting tetronome shapes into a grid trying to fill it up, and make a scoring rectangle.

It actually makes a refreshing change from the other roll and write games out there.

Second game of the evening was new group darling Las Vegas. We played a couple of games of this. Our second game roped in one of the Luxe staff who was off duty. Boy did I suck in that game. I kept getting screwed over. However the new person really got into the game, and her banter towards Nathan was very colourful and humorous when she thought she had denied Nathan a $90,000 note, only for him to get the majority back on his turn.

During our playing of Las Vegas a person came in and started talking to Nathan. Which isn’t out of the ordinary. It is his place of work. It’s his job. But there was some confusion on my part. They were actually there to find out about the club! Which to me wasn’t that obvious to start with. I gave details about when we run sessions, how many normally attend. But it hadn’t really clicked even then that this is what they were there for, and not to see Nathan. I definitely wasn’t as welcoming as I should have been. It’s not an excuse but I was a little caught off guard. My introverted self came through.

Our third and final game of the evening was Skull that pulled in two more people. So became a six player game. This was a blast to play.

Through out the evening there was plenty of banter and laughs. A very relaxed atmosphere. Probably one of, if not the most relaxed one of our sessions has been. It was very evident during the games of Skull.

This was a really fun evening. A big big thank you to Nathan for running and hosting at the Luxe.

Games played: Patchwork Doodle, Las Vegas, Skull

Banter between players is a part of game night. That friendly ribbing between players.

Part of our banter at Fenland Gamers is over the colour yellow (which we will refer to as filthy yellow) and Jonathan’s irrational liking of the colour. It’s his favourite colour to be fair. So often the banter is that when people are selecting who plays what colour normally Jonathan hides yellow up, and says there is no yellow, and then surprisingly when it comes to him selecting a colour he discovers there is yellow after all. Whilst I try and remove yellow without him seeing.

Ok you have to be there. It doesn’t read as funny.

Another source of banter when Jonathan pops out a new game that has deckbuilding as a major mechanic. It’s funny because Jonathan is not a fan of that mechanic.

That’s why playing The Taverns of Tiefenthal (TOT) with him as a learning game last Friday evening was funny.

I think games like TOT are probably the just acceptable form of a deckbuilder that Jonathan will play. And dare I say it possibly enjoy!

I have to say TOT uses deckbuilding nicely as the main mechanic. Add in the dice placement and drafting, with a fixed number of rounds and you have a nice game that gives you some interesting decisions to make each round.

I’d go as far to say you almost don’t feel that you are deckbuilding. There are opportunities to thin the deck of cards, but it’s not an aggressive strategy you could follow. There is not enough time over the limited number of rounds to do that.

Your main decisions on a round are based on the cards you draw for the tavern and the dice you are able to draft. Basically you are either generating money or mugs of beer. You then have to decide how you are going to spend what you have generated. Are you buying tavern cards with the money or upgrading your tavern. Upgrading your tavern gets you a high scoring noble card on top of a more powerful action space. Or are you buying guests with the beer generated?

It is a nice blend of mechanics and decisions. If you asked me I think I prefer this over Clank! And it is miles better than the recent Undaunted: Normandy, where I didn’t think the deckbuilding worked at all.

Our gaming finished with a couple of games of Las Vegas. Still loving this classic.

Games Played: Taverns of Tiefenthal, Las Vegas

A movie and gaming, what a great way to start the holiday season and the weekend. How could it be any better? Well Netflix decided they could by dropping The Witcher (based on the books and video games) tv series.

So the morning was spent watching the first few episodes of that. I’ve not played the video games (shocking I know, and something I should put to right at some point) and I’ve never read the books. Which means I’m coming in cold to this knowing nothing of the lore, the characters etc.

It also means that I was sold entirely on this series in the run up by the promos that were released during the year. So what little excitement I had was based on those alone. There were no expectations or preconceived ideas, other than those created by the said promos.

From the three or four episodes that I’ve watched so far I’m enjoying the series a lot. I like the aesthetics of the series. The costume design, set design, tone. For me it works. Production wise, ok we weren’t going to get the massive army battles of LoTR or even AGoT. But the one major battle so far I was impressed with. It was handled well. I like the way the plot is developing, and the interchanging between each characters storylines. You know at some point they will intersect, and I want to know how, and can’t wait for it to happen, and see where that goes. That for me is the sign of good storytelling.

One thing I did think is this whole Witcher universe would make a great setting for an RPG. Guess what, one has already been done. I know nothing about it, no idea what system it’s similar too, or even how popular it is.

But the whole premise isn’t too dissimilar to a D&D campaign with the traveling from town to town killing monsters for financial reward. It’s the lore and the role of magic within the world that is obviously different. From what I can tell from the tv series, the world that The Witcher is set is very low magic. Similar to Dragonlance I suspect. What magic there is comes at a price.

I don’t think it would be too hard to put a Witcher based campaign together. There are pdf files out there by fans for the official RPG that stat out all the monsters that exist in the Witcher world. I’d be tempted to just do the D&D thing and reskin an existing D&D monster.

If you want something cool to binge watch this weekend this show is it.

Ok the big release of the weekend (Well technically mid week) Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker was a movie I did have some preconceived ideas about. In the run up to it’s release the leaks, rumours and general feel for this movie was not looking good. So I naturally had set my expectations low.

I actually enjoyed the movie. It’s definitely better than The Last Jedi. Which for the record I dislike.

It’s rushed and the story is a mess because of the previous movie. The criticism that this trilogy was created with no over all arching story/plan is evident when you look at the three in a whole. The hoops that this movie has to jump through to pick up the pieces left by the train wreck that was the previous movie, have a negative impact. But I will add despite this criticism the movie is still enjoyable.

There is some great fan service in this movie. Which does add to the enjoyment.

Overall it’s an average Star Wars movie. Not the best, but not the worst.

If after watching you want to play some Star Wars board games, any of the FFG games would suffice. I’d avoid the mainstream offerings, unless it’s Looping Chewie for a younger fan. FFG also do the official RPG if that is a universe you want to explore. Plus the original 80’s RPG was reprinted last year. So you could step back in time to play a classic 80’s RPG.

After the film Jonathan and I had some time to kill before the start of the Fenland Gamers Christmas gaming session. So after getting a beverage, Jonathan cracked out a game we hadn’t played since 2016 (according to the stats app I use).

Our main game of the evening was five player Wingspan. It’s not my favourite player count for the game. I prefer the middle counts for the game. I definitely wouldn’t want to play it at six players as some online are asking for.

I managed to get a tuck engine going on the wet lands, plus a nice round end triggered bird that tucked cards based on grass land actions done by another player.

But in the end all it got me was third place.

Our final game of the evening was No Thanks! We played using the Amigo variant detailed in the rules. This basically removes the 10, 20 and 30 numbered cards from the game plus six random cards. It made the game a bit more interesting. Some how Jonathan won this also.

It was a great day. Star Wars, board gaming. Great hosts as always.

Games played: Brew crafters, Wingspan, No Thanks!

Last night was once again the second Wednesday of the month, and therefore time once again for the monthly meet up of the Fenland Gamers.

Our game for the evening was a five player (The Usual Suspect, Diego, Gavin, Ollie and myself) game of Wingspan with the European Expansion. Plus the Swift starter pack cards were also shuffled in.

For those not aware a slight tweak was made to the Wingspan base game. For starters it’s price was increased a little to cover the addition of the Swift starter pack that was added. This consists of ten new bird cards and four guides for new players. The guides take new players through their first four turns of the game. They even specify which of the ten new birds that the player starts with. So a very new player friendly addition to the game. I can see why they did this. With the wide appeal the game has outside of the hobby, making it easier for those new to this type of game get playing it is a great idea. Naturally this is something owners of an original version of the game can pick up from the Stonemaier website for $5 plus postage. It’s probably one of the better “promo” things for a game value wise you can pick up. You can easily pay the same for a single promo card for other games elsewhere.

So with the new expansion plus the starter pack, that’s an additional 91 cards being added to the game. Which with the 170 cards of the original game makes a grand total of 161 bird cards.

After a brief recap of the rules we started to play.

I deviated from the usual setup by dealing three bonus cards to each player to choose from.

Our end of round goals were (Round 1 – 4 going left to right in the photo below):

The round 2 goal fitted nicely with my end game bonus card that was to do,with birds that could only be played in the grasslands.

It was nice to have pulled one of the new goal tiles for this game.

I’d like to point out Gavin did get one of the OP raven cards in his opening hand. But played it into his wetland instead of grassland. Which was a minor tactical error for that card.

I think by the end of the game everyone had one of the new birds in their reserve giving them an end of round bonus of some sort. Mine was one that allowed me to discard up to five food and then put that many cards from the deck tucked under it. That alone got me 13 points.

Diego had one that put a number of rodent food tokens on his bird based on which player had the most birds with the hunting symbol. Which Ollie kept adding to his reserve. I think last round that got him 6 points. It was a nice synergy for Diego, because Ollie’s bonus card needed him to have those cards out.

Unusually for me I had only 9 eggs out for scoring. I have lots more than that usually. The decision you have to make during the last round for each action you get to take is, will this get me more points than taking the egg action and any when activated stuff that gets points? For me taking the food action could match it, plus set me up for the end of round activation as well. This is why I rarely play a bird in the final round. It rarely is worth the points it gives you, both in terms of action economy and points generated.

In the end I managed to sneak a win by 4 points. Then Ollie and Diego drew for second place, and Gavin and The Usual Suspect drew for last place. The draws surprised me. I don’t think I’ve seen a double draw like that before.

It was a fun evening, great hosts as usual. Looking forward to our holiday sessions.