Loch Lomond and Trossachs NP Informal Camping Bylaw Consultation Period Starts
Posted on | February 8, 2010 | 11 Comments
Those of you with a long memory will remember a post of mine entitled “A Couple Of Questions For You” about a story that was being run at the time about the problems the Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park was having with so called “wild campers”.
Well now the Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park Authority are going into a 12 week public consultation period (starts today) on a new proposed bylaw they want to introduce that will allow them to crack down on this problem.
I do like the fact they have stopped referring to it incorrectly as “wild camping” which it most certainly was not, and have given it the name of “informal camping”.
You can get more info on the official site here and also read the actual document here.
So how does this affect us of the backpacking world? Well basically it means that in the area they want to apply this new bylaw to you won’t be able to camp unless in one of the official camp sites. But if you read the planned proposals then there are exceptions. One of which would allow backpackers to carry on as before, kind of. Here’s what it says:
“On prior application in writing to the Authority by an individual or group,the Authority shall be entitled at its sole discretion to grant exemption under these byelaws in circumstances where, in the opinion of the Authority acting reasonably, the activity or activities concerned would further the aims of the Park. Any exemption granted shall be in writing, shall specify the activity or activities for which the exemption is granted and shall specify the duration of the exempted period, and any terms or conditions which may apply. It shall be an offence to fail to comply with any such terms or conditions imposed by the Authority.”
I welcome this exemption, but I also hope that a bit of common sense will be shown by the Park Authorities and Law Enforcement Agencies when coming across backpackers, and that they will not be heavy handed in their actions if they don’t have written permission. Backpackers are not the problem here, and it is usually pretty obvious who is a backpacker and who isn’t.
I can see why the Park Authorities need to do this, however I fear that they will use this to harrass backpackers as well.
You can also read the BBC Scotland coverage of this story as well here. A certain blogger gets quoted in the story as well 
Comments
11 Responses to “Loch Lomond and Trossachs NP Informal Camping Bylaw Consultation Period Starts”
Leave a Reply
Subscription Options
or in the top right hand corner of the screen. You can use the following button to add the feed to Google Reader for you automatically!
Or how about being able to subscribe to whitespider1066.com by Email?
You can subscribe to my iTunes feed by clicking on the button
Translator
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | |
| By N2H | |||||||
Categories
Archives
Outdoors Ads
Outdoor Resources
BackpackingVideos.Com a site where you'll kill some time on a lazy Saturday afternoon (or procrastinating at work) browsing videos about your favorite hobby.TGO Website and Forums The TGO Magazine forums, you can also access the website from here as well.
The place to go if you are an Outdoors blogger and want to talk shop, have a techie question, etc.
whitespider1066.com's Facebook Page
Fast Links To Useful Stuff
Podcasts
Home to my weekly blogger and podcast round up AND has some fantastic podcasts and vidcasts about the outdoors.
The Wildebeat The audio journal about getting into the wilderness.
More to be added soon...
February 8th, 2010 @ 4:12 pm
Fame at last!
Does this mean that thru-hikers on the WHW need to ask for permission to properly wild camp along the Loch Lomond stretch? I wouldn’t think that would be “further[ing] the aims of the Park”.
It’s been obvious for some time that something needed done about those who think it’s OK to turn up, trash the place and bugger off again. Rights and responsibilities go hand in hand.
February 8th, 2010 @ 4:57 pm
Simon, I’ve just checked the map of the area covered and under these new bylaws as they currently stand. Yes you are correct you would need to get permission in writing before hand even if doing the WHW.
February 8th, 2010 @ 7:49 pm
Every sympathy with the NP wanting to control the antisocial great unwashed, but how is one supposed to know these new bylaws exist when you’re in an unfamiliar area? Sounds like a recipe for confusion when it is widely known that ‘wild camping’ is fair game north of the border.
I mean for folks walking the WHW or cycling with camping gear – I’m sure we’re not all going to be stopping to read different sets of posted ‘rules’ at each bridge/gate/style/county border.
February 8th, 2010 @ 10:51 pm
Rob, I agree that there is the potential there for a lot of confusion. Hence why I think there should be common sense applied.
February 8th, 2010 @ 11:00 pm
Good piece Darren. I think the key point is that the access legislation was never intended to allow roadside camping like this. As you say, it’s good the park has stopped calling this wild camping.
Once past Ptarmigan Lodge wild camping is okay so WHW walkers still have plenty of wild camping opportunities. If camping before then there are the commercial sites.
February 9th, 2010 @ 8:11 am
I can’t really see the problem. If you’ve ever been along that stretch in summer, you’d know why they’re doing this. It can become very unpleasant and intimidating. I remember dragging a kayak out of the loch and through an impromptu rave full of pissed weegies. Braemar has the same problem. They even burn the tents at the end of the weekend there.
February 9th, 2010 @ 8:15 am
Chris thanks for the great advice and comment.
February 9th, 2010 @ 8:19 am
Alistair, I’m not disagreeing with what they are doing. I’m just asking that when the authorities come across a backpacker that they apply common sense.
February 9th, 2010 @ 9:19 am
yep, you’d think they would apply common sense to a backpacker Darren but I sort of feel sympathy for the rangers. Apparently they’re going to become the UK’s first and only “outdoor” special constables. I just see that as plain wrong. Confronting vandals, making arrests and crowd control is the job of the police, not rangers. If I was a countryside ranger I would be angry at having to do the police’s job for them. I’ve never seen the attraction of “wild” camping between Balmaha and Rowardennan, mostly coz I used to live near there and know what it’s like in the summer. They fished a load of body parts out of the loch at the Rowardennan pier years ago. You get all sorts in that area!
February 9th, 2010 @ 9:48 am
Alistair, I agree with you it does seem that the rangers are having more dumped on to their plate. I hope that with the increase in responsibilities they are compensated with an increase in pay as well. But knowing how things work, I would bet good money that they are not.
February 11th, 2010 @ 12:39 pm
And this is how access rights die out through fear and knee-jerk responses. The laws exist already to catch irresponsible campers, they are just not policed properly (for whatever reason). The key point is responsibility, camping is not a problem if done responsibly. I can pull up in a car, put up a tent for a day or two, make very little noise and leave without leaving more than an indent in the grass, yet I’m being restricted because the rangers are not able to (paid enough to etc) spot the people leaving litter and making trouble. Odd.